JOB INTERVIEW (AUTHOR MARIA FERNANDA BAÑUELOS)
Besides of job applications, interview technique is definitely the most common tool that job seekers finds in its way. Not surprisingly, the interviews have generated hundreds of studies over the past 20 years, covering topics such as verbal and nonverbal behavior, personality traits, print management, similarities between interviewer and interviewee and impressions before the interview.
Due to the extensive use of interviews to select employees must maximize their potential to identify qualified individuals. Two strategies to make better the interview are 1) structured in a way that is reliable and valid, and 2) train managers to apply the best techniques of the method.
Types of interviews
Job interviews vary in two aspects:
- The structure
Job interviews vary in two aspects:
- The structure
- If they are based on experiences or assumptions.
Structure
.- Unstructured. Does not follow a script or a set order. The questions are not prepared in advance and there is no guarantee to them by the same applicants. The interviewer does not have a rating system.
.- Unstructured. Does not follow a script or a set order. The questions are not prepared in advance and there is no guarantee to them by the same applicants. The interviewer does not have a rating system.
.- Structured. It is based on a preset form. Are more reliable and valid than the first.
The importance of structure in the interview is underlined by the fact that this uniformity should minimize the potential for intentional or unintentional tendencies of the interviewer that affect the results. Furthermore, this uniformity should have a lower differential effect on women and minorities and should increase the likelihood that the organization won its defense in case the demand.
The second dimension ranging interviews is whether focusing on experience and past performance or hypothetical future conduct. Such interviews can be divided into two types:
- Behavioral Description Interview (BDI) in which respondents are asked to actual incidents that have relevant work experience to the position requested. The BDI is based on the premise that the past is what best predicts the future. Example: "Remember your last job and tell me about a time you resolved a dispute with a customer."
- "Situational Interview (SI) also seeks to determine whether the applicant possesses the knowledge and motivation to the job, but achieves this goal differently. The questions is to encourage respondents to respond to hypothetical situations they would face in office seeking. Example: "If one of the doctors in his sales territory to ask him to support research and other documents about the effectiveness of a new drug, how would I find information?. Then would qualify the responses to hypothetical questions as to whether appropriate or not for the job.
Training as an interviewer
Despite the recent optimism about the validity of job interviews, have yet to answer many questions about its effectiveness. For years there have been fears that the accuracy of interviewers vary too, well, it's always in the possibility of their prejudice, since the interviews rely on subjective judgments. The following list summarizes the problems that limit the accuracy of an interview feature. These errors are the focus of many training programs for interviewers.
1. The interviewer Spears a lot and reduce the amount of job information obtained from the interviewees.
2. Inconstancy of the questions asked of applicants, resulting in different information that is collected from each.
3. Ask questions that do not relate to job performance.
4. Inability to reassure the interviewee during the session, which makes the spontaneous gathering information.
5. Excessive confidence in the interviewer's ability to assess the applicants, which leads to hasty decisions.
6. Typify applicants and allow personal preferences to influence the evaluation.
7. Be influenced by the nonverbal behavior of applicants.
7. Be influenced by the nonverbal behavior of applicants.
8. Put the same rating applicants in many evaluations, both superior (leniency error), average (central tendency error) or bad (severe error)
9. Allow certain features, good or bad, influence the evaluation of other characteristics (halo error)
10. Allow the quality of applicants that preceded the current influence their ratings (contrast effect)
11. To evaluate the applicant in the first minutes of the interview (the first printing error)
12. Favorably evaluate an applicant because he looks the interviewer in some way (like failure to me)
12. Favorably evaluate an applicant because he looks the interviewer in some way (like failure to me)
In general, well-designed training programs are able to reduce many errors in traditional unstructured interviews, especially when training is done together with a structured interview format. Through training, managers better understand how to ask questions, how to record responses from the applicants and, to some extent, how to become aware of possible trends. Moreover, recent studies indicate that when a trained interviewer takes notes on behavior during the interview, its validity improvement.